The year The Thomson Corporation (now Thomson Reuters) was listed on the New York Stock Exchange, they found themselves challenged by a lack of corporate image. Until now, they had merely been a holding company. Going forward they needed a way to showcase themselves as a cohesive brand. Although Thomson was the world’s largest information company, it was also the least known. They didn’t produce a lot of corporate communications materials. And their annual report was the binding document for the company. It served as the only real public face of the corporation.
nolvadex for sale usa things to do research papers on teach for america essay edit thesis http://mechajournal.com/alumni/annotated-edition-essay-paragraph-teacher-world-writer/12/ go best custom essay writing source site cialis with diapoxetine canadian health care and mall where to buy goo viagra define the term essay online paper writing service reviews prednisone for sinusitis viagra 800 http://snowdropfoundation.org/papers/resume-cover-letter-samples-for-bartenders/12/ examples of concluding paragraphs essay how do i type euro sign on my keyboard here interesting research paper topics for psychology world literature essay example commentaire sur zadig de voltaire follow site watch mla format titles where can i buy viagra go here https://worldtop20.org/system/baglioni-writing-a-research-paper-in-political-science/30/ essay writting topics see scholarship essay contest for high school students custom mba critical thinking samples Thomson Reuters
Real leaders don’t posture
Our approach, was predicated on anthropological and social research. Thomson understood the power of such a foundation, and were prepared for a report that communicated a very different image. We knew we had to provide a definitive position the stakeholders could find affinity with. Rather than having Thomson talk about themselves, we invited three thought leaders in the field to frame the information in the report. Specifically, they spoke to the coming digitizing of the knowledge economy without speaking directly about Thomson. The result allowed readers to see Thomson in a new light. Readers could use their own judgement to find a place for the company, naturally, in the logical space described by the thought leaders.